Lessons Learned at the Fortress of Faith: Part 3


Lessons Learned at the Fortress of Faith: Part 3


This is Part 3 of a 10-part blog series.
Intro­duc­tion | Part 1 | Part 2

Lesson #3: It’s sometimes right to do “wrong.”

As I’ve stat­ed before, Bob Jones Uni­ver­si­ty habit­u­al­ly cre­at­ed spir­i­tu­al moun­tains out of cir­cum­stan­tial mole­hills. We were to strive for per­fec­tion in every aspect of life, and any­thing less than that was an offense to God and the admin­is­tra­tion.

There’s a say­ing from the founder of the school…well, I mean, there’s hon­est­ly a bajil­lion say­ings from the founder of the school. They’re so revered that they are lit­er­al­ly engraved in plaques in every class­room across cam­pus, and you can even buy a book filled with his quips of wis­dom. But one say­ing in par­tic­u­lar was quot­ed quite a bit when I was there: “It is nev­er right to do wrong in order to get a chance to do right.” On the sur­face, and espe­cial­ly when I very first arrived on cam­pus, I agreed with this 100%.

Again, I’m faced with the dif­fi­cul­ty of explain­ing a sub­cul­ture when some of my audi­ence has nev­er expe­ri­enced it, and some of it may think there’s noth­ing wrong with it. It’s dif­fi­cult to know where to begin or how to explain things that I intu­itive­ly learned through var­i­ous cir­cum­stances, oth­er than to talk about the var­i­ous cir­cum­stances that taught me that some­times, it’s good and right to do “wrong.”

I don't have the 2008 handbook, but it looks like a similar statement is included in the 2013 handbook.

I don’t have the 2008 hand­book, but it looks like a sim­i­lar state­ment is includ­ed in the 2013 hand­book.

When I arrived on cam­pus, I was giv­en a stu­dent hand­book and told that I’d be required to turn in a state­ment say­ing that I’d read it.

It was pret­ty thick, about 80 pages, full of the var­i­ous rules and require­ments that came with being a stu­dent at Bob Jones Uni­ver­si­ty. Hon­est­ly, this had been one of the things I was most look­ing for­ward to: read­ing what I was sure would be absolute­ly ridicu­lous rules. At this point, their stu­dent hand­book wasn’t avail­able online, so in many ways, I didn’t quite know what I was get­ting into.

To my sur­prise, the state­ment I was to sign was a sheet in the back of the book that essen­tial­ly said, “By choos­ing to enroll as a stu­dent at BJU, I agree to sub­mit to the admin­is­tra­tion and fol­low all of these rules.” You know. All. 80. Pages. Of them. Includ­ing rules that stat­ed we couldn’t share the hand­book with any­one out­side the uni­ver­si­ty and rules that appar­ent­ly gov­erned how we were “allowed” to act off cam­pus in our own homes and required us to spy on our fel­low class­mates and report back to the admin­is­tra­tion with our find­ings lest we be pun­ished as severe­ly as they.

Curi­ous, I asked my prayer cap­tain what would hap­pen if I didn’t sign it.

You’ll be sent home.”

I was absolute­ly floored. Hav­ing actu­al­ly tak­en the time to read it, I knew that I couldn’t in good con­science agree with every­thing in the book. And that phras­ing, “by choos­ing to enroll as a stu­dent” — how duplic­i­tous! It’s not like I’d been allowed to view the hand­book before I enrolled as a stu­dent. When you with­hold crit­i­cal infor­ma­tion, you make informed con­sent impos­si­ble.

Yet I was stuck on cam­pus now, 500 miles from home. What choice did I have?

As I signed the state­ment to be turned in, I wrote in the mar­gin that I was doing so under duress, that I was com­mit­ted to fol­low­ing Scrip­ture rather than and over the stu­dent hand­book. I expect­ed to be pun­ished some­how, but sur­pris­ing­ly nev­er was. I don’t know why, or if they even real­ly checked what I’d writ­ten. But I nev­er quite for­got the under­hand­ed­ness involved in not allow­ing enrolling stu­dents to know the rules until they were already on cam­pus with no real choice to leave.

In the first cou­ple of weeks of school, I noticed some­thing strange about one of my pro­fes­sors. He stared at me an awful lot, and took to mak­ing small talk with me before and after class. When it came time for a seat­ing chart to be final­ized, I found myself seat­ed direct­ly in front of his desk, which seemed to make me the go-to class helper when­ev­er he need­ed tech­ni­cal assis­tance or any oth­er kind of help.

It wasn’t until it was time for my first soci­ety meet­ing, when I walked out of my dorm to see him stand­ing there, wait­ing for me, that I real­ized some­thing was…real­ly not quite right.

It was the first Fri­day after Rush, there­fore the first Fri­day I as a new stu­dent would have a soci­ety meet­ing. My soci­ety, Alpha Gam­ma Tau, was meet­ing across cam­pus. And my pro­fes­sor decid­ed that he should walk me to my meet­ing. Because that is total­ly appro­pri­ate.

At one point as he was try­ing to make per­son­al con­ver­sa­tion, he men­tioned that he liked my neck­lace. I glanced down at the chok­er I was wear­ing, a brass medal­lion hang­ing from it, and smiled, remark­ing, “Thanks! I bought it because it remind­ed me of the head­piece of the staff of Ra.” His expres­sion was so com­i­cal that I didn’t both­er to clar­i­fy that I was ref­er­enc­ing my love for Indi­ana Jones, not any wor­ship of a false god.

I hoped that this inter­ac­tion would ensure that his atten­tion towards me would cool off, but if any­thing, it became so reg­u­lar and focused that I start­ed to wor­ry for my safe­ty. I stopped par­tic­i­pat­ing in class, stopped acknowl­edg­ing him as best as I pos­si­bly could, did every­thing I knew how to do to min­i­mize my con­tact with him. I told no one on cam­pus about any of it, intu­itive­ly real­iz­ing that I’d be told that I was mak­ing things up and just try­ing to ruin a god­ly man’s rep­u­ta­tion. It was nec­es­sary for me to be a “poor stew­ard” of my grade in an attempt to be a good stew­ard of my safe­ty.

Michael and me, at the symphonic wind band concert after the Christmas lighting ceremony in early December, 2008.

Michael and me, at the sym­phon­ic wind band con­cert after the Christ­mas light­ing cer­e­mo­ny in ear­ly Decem­ber, 2008.

Per­haps in no greater way did I learn that some­times doing some­thing “wrong” was some­times good than in my rela­tion­ship with Michael, my BJU col­lege boyfriend and cur­rent spouse.

I’ve stat­ed before that my men­tal health was pret­ty abysmal when I was at BJU. I had slipped back into anorex­ia, I severe­ly depressed, and quick­ly became sui­ci­dal.

So when I first start­ed hang­ing out with Michael, it was most­ly to make sure that I didn’t hurt myself. We soon fell in love, much to my sur­prise. (More on that at a lat­er date — it’s a les­son com­plete­ly unto itself.)

One after­noon, I walked into my dorm room to find a friend excit­ed­ly telling one of my room­mates, “I’ve nev­er seen her so hap­py and at peace.” I asked who she was talk­ing about, and she grinned and said, “You! Ever since you start­ed dat­ing Michael.” I was star­tled that our rela­tion­ship appar­ent­ly was mak­ing such a dif­fer­ence in my life, but she was right. I was hap­pi­er, health­i­er, eat­ing more often, feel­ing more sta­ble. He was good for me. He made me feel safe, under­stood, loved and pro­tect­ed. And that was a big deal.

A big enough deal that we had sex over Christ­mas break. The Great Trans­gres­sion.

One of the things about puri­ty cul­ture is how it seeks to sup­press women’s sex­u­al­i­ty. We’re not sup­posed to look sexy, and we’re cer­tain­ly not sup­posed to feel sex­u­al things. In gen­er­al, that hadn’t been a huge prob­lem for me. I liked the idea of sex, but didn’t trust any­one enough to actu­al­ly want to have sex with them. After so many vio­la­tions of my body, I thought that I’d nev­er be able to trust any­one that way.

I’d be lying if I said that I didn’t feel the heart­break that puri­ty cul­ture told me I’d feel after hav­ing sex with Michael. In truth, I was actu­al­ly sui­ci­dal again. Despon­dent. In com­plete and utter despair. But — please hear me on this — it wasn’t because of the sex. It was because of 21 years of puri­ty cul­ture telling me that if I had sex, I was a bro­ken rose. A cup with spit in it. A used car. Inhu­man. Worth­less. To be despised. As I’ve said before, sto­ries are so impor­tant. And when you tell some­one a sto­ry for decades that if they trans­gress, they are evil…how else are they to feel but evil? What else have you done but cre­ate a self-ful­fill­ing prophe­cy?

I remem­ber being so very con­fused. Before the real­iza­tion hit that I was now going to be con­sid­ered utter­ly defiled, I was…happy. I felt whole. I felt hope. Sex was so very dif­fer­ent from rape. Shar­ing such an inti­ma­cy with some­one I loved and trust­ed with my whole being, some­one who would nev­er hurt or use me…it was heal­ing. It was won­der­ful. It was home.

It took me years into my mar­riage to real­ize that what I’d been told about sex and puri­ty was all wrong. Michael didn’t see me any dif­fer­ent­ly after sex. He didn’t love me any less, he didn’t respect me any less, he didn’t leave me. (How hor­ri­bly puri­ty cul­ture taught me to view men!) We were adults, shar­ing a moment togeth­er that we’d enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly con­sent­ed to share. And it was good.

Despite every­thing that fol­lowed — from the coun­sel­ing we were giv­en from our church to being expelled from BJU — despite what we’d been taught to believe about the nature of sex with­out a wed­ding ring and how it would break us and make us dirty and unclean and defiled before God and despised by our fel­low Chris­tians…despite it being con­sid­ered so very wrong, it was right for us and it was good.

It was good.

Be sure to check out the Lessons Learned at the Fortress of Faith!

Posted in Fat Girl,